Bernie Sanders pulls off his signature vague hand gesture, whilst wearing a particularly fetching suit. |
Why is America feeling the Bern?
Bernie Sanders is America’s only self-described socialist Senator. He has been a representative since 1990 and has received almost no recognition outside of Vermont until recently. So, what has driven Sanders to relative success this year?
On
November 6th 1990, 209,856 Vermont voters turned out to elect a
little-known independent candidate, Bernie Sanders, to the House of
Representatives; he received 56% of the vote. This prompted The Washington Post
to declare him the “First Socialist Elected” – he was also the first
independent candidate to become a representative for over 40 years.
People sensed Bernie would upset the establishment – he was out of the
ordinary – and that he did. Sanders estranged friends and foes alike by
declaring that both political parties were mere puppets for corporate
interests, and several of his early speeches to the floor in the House
of Representatives focused on addressing the revolving door between
corporate business and prominent public office.
Bernie
then fronted several high-profile movements; some were successes,
others were total abject failures. In 1993, Bernie was part of a small
minority who voted against the Brady Bill, which mandated background
checks in order to purchase guns, but the law was passed anyway (it was
signed into law by Bill Clinton that November), with over 202 million
Brady background checks completed since its implementation. However, a
marginally successful campaign was his opposition to the Patriot Act – a
piece of legislation “to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools”
in order to “deter and punish terrorist acts”. He voted against the
original legislation; promoted later amendments that aimed to restrict
the effects – many of these were passed – and drafted an amendment
himself that was passed through the House of Representatives.
But
Bernie’s political ideology had been formed long before he had even
considered becoming a representative. As a young Jewish boy living in
Brooklyn, New York, Sanders had stood as class president in high school
on the premise of providing “scholarships to war orphans in Korea”.
Unfortunately, he came in third (only time will tell if he faces a
similar losing fate in the Democratic nominations), but this situation
serves as an illustration of why a growing portion of the country are
“feeling the Bern” – he has an ideology and he is prepared to fight for
it, and, unlike his opponents, has been fighting for it unwaveringly
since Day One.
Similar
things have been said about Donald Trump – people embrace his
no-nonsense way of speaking – but it is important to make a distinction
between the two men. Bernie Sanders has spent his entire life devoted to
promoting the ideology he believes in, whereas Donald Trump has spent a
large portion of his making money. For many Americans, this is exactly
what makes Trump so popular; his ability to make money and run a successful business.
Nevertheless, there is a clear difference between the two candidates;
they have travelled very different paths in life, and this affects how
they go about their politics (i.e. Donald Trump is aggressive because it
is an effective strategy in the board room, whereas Sanders is calm and
measured – normally – because this is the best way to address the House
of Representatives or the Senate).
Many
political commentators have claimed that Bernie is a populist, and to
some extent this is true; his political aims align closely with that of
an awful lot of the population. However, it is important not to overuse
the term ‘populist’. The fact that a politician represents the wants of
the public is not populism, it is simply a symptom of a functional and
healthy democracy, and it is a refreshing thing to see in today’s world
of party politics. Whether termed populism or not, the key to Sanders’
popularity and relative success is the fact that his policies resonate
with many American voters.
Another
important point to make is that a similar phenomena has been occurring
around the world in recent years: the election of Syriza, an
anti-austerity “coalition of the radical left”, in Greece; a wave of
support for Podemos in Spain; and perhaps most prominently, the election of Jeremy Corbyn as the Labour Party leader in the UK following a nation-wide public vote.
It seems as though the “Sanders phenomenon” is occuring across the
world: a hopeful movement, pushing left-wing parties and candidates into
the public eye. Whether you believe this is a good thing or not, one
thing is for sure: it’s going to be interesting to see where we’re
headed.
No comments:
Post a Comment